On-page SEO Grader
What is On-page SEO Grader + Fix Suggestions
On-page SEO Grader + Fix Suggestions is for the moment you’ve written a page, picked a target keyword, and you still feel unsure about what to change first. Maybe the copy reads fine, but the page is not pulling in the right visits. Or a teammate asks for an “SEO check” and you don’t want to reply with vague advice.
The free On-page SEO Grader + Fix Suggestions by FlexiTools.io gives you a clear report from the content you paste on screen. In under 60 seconds, you can enter a Target keyword, paste your page HTML or text, click Grade Page, and get a score plus fix suggestions you can copy and share. What’s the one change that will matter most right now?
How to Use Our On-page SEO Grader + Fix Suggestions
Type your focus term into Target keyword. If you want, add a Page URL (optional) to keep the report tied to a specific page you’re reviewing.
In Paste HTML or page text, paste the page HTML or the main content text. This field is large, so you can drop in a full page section without trimming it first.
Click Grade Page. The message area updates, the Score changes from a dash to a number, and the checks table fills with rows under Check, Status, and Detail.
Read Fix suggestions, then use Copy Report if you want to paste the findings into a doc or ticket. If you need the output in a structured format, click Download JSON. Use Clear to wipe the fields, or Load Example to see how the report looks with sample input.
Why FlexiTools.io Offers the Best On-page SEO Grader + Fix Suggestions
It works from the text you have, even before a page is live
The tool lets you paste HTML or page text, so you can grade a draft from a doc or a staging snippet. Many graders only work if they can read a live page. Here, you can review content while it’s still being edited.
Checks are visible and explained, not buried
The results are laid out as a table with three columns: Check, Status, and Detail. That makes it easier to understand what passed, what failed, and why. When you are handing feedback to a writer, those “detail” notes save back-and-forth.
Fix suggestions are kept in one place for copy-paste work
The Fix suggestions block sits under the table and is focusable, so you can click into it and move through the text. This helps when you are pulling action items into a task list. You don’t have to rewrite the report from scratch.
Built-in actions match real review loops
The buttons reflect how people actually work: Load Example to understand the output, Clear to start fresh, Copy Report to share, and Download JSON to save the results in a consistent format. The message area and score also update using live status regions, so changes are easier to track as you run the grade again.
This tool: Paste content, grade it, review a score, scan checks with details, then copy or download the report.
Typical alternatives: Manual checklists that miss things, or tools that only work from a live URL and don’t explain the “why.”
Frustration avoided here: Vague feedback like “add the keyword more.” The table and fix suggestions give you concrete next steps tied to the pasted page.
A Deeper Look at On-page SEO Grading and Fix Suggestions
On-page SEO is mostly about clarity. You’re helping people and systems understand what a page is about, how it’s structured, and whether it matches the query you care about. A grader turns that broad goal into smaller checks you can act on. In this tool, you see those checks as rows in a table, each with a status and a detail note. You also get a score, which acts like a quick summary of how many checks look good.
Why the target keyword matters
The Target keyword field gives the tool a focus point. Without it, “good SEO” becomes a guessing game. With it, the report can judge whether the page content appears aligned with the term you entered. That alignment is not just repetition. It’s about whether the main topic shows up in places readers expect, and whether supporting text stays on-topic.
HTML vs page text
The tool accepts Paste HTML or page text because people review content in different states. If you paste HTML, you’re giving the tool a view that may include headings and other structure. If you paste plain text, you’re giving the tool the body copy in the form you might share with a writer. Either way, the tool grades what you provide, then explains its findings in the checks table and fix suggestions.
How to read the score without overreacting
The Score is a shortcut, not a verdict. It helps you spot when a page is far from ready or close enough to ship. The real value is in the table rows. A single failed check with a strong detail note can be more important than several minor passes.
Using the checks table like a to-do list
Each row gives you three things: what was checked, whether it passed, and a detail explaining what was found. When you’re editing a page, work from the most concrete items first. If a detail tells you something is missing, add it. If it tells you something is weak, rewrite a small section and grade again.
A simple way to stay sane is to fix one theme per run. For example, do one pass to tighten the page’s topic focus, then another pass to improve how sections are labeled and ordered. The tool supports this because you can keep the same keyword, update the pasted content, and click Grade Page again.
What “Fix suggestions” are best for
The Fix suggestions block is the bridge between “analysis” and “editing.” It’s where you pull next actions from the report without rereading the whole table. I often treat it like a checklist I can paste into a ticket, then mark items off as I update the page copy.
A quick, realistic workflow example
I’ve used graders like this when a landing page felt scattered. The target keyword was clear, but the pasted text had three different product angles and no strong through-line. After grading, the check details made it obvious the page wasn’t reinforcing the same topic in key spots. I rewrote the opening paragraph to match the keyword intent, tightened the headings, pasted the updated content, and graded again. The score moved, but more importantly, the fix suggestions shifted from “core alignment” to smaller cleanups.
Grounding your edits in trusted guidance
If you want a strong baseline for what “on-page SEO” covers, Google Search Central’s SEO starter guide is a useful reference. For practical guidance on writing clear, scannable content that holds up under review, PlainLanguage.gov writing guidelines can help you tighten sentences before you paste them into the tool.
Pro-Tips for Getting the Most Out of On-page SEO Grading
Grade the “main content” first, then the whole page. Start by pasting just the core section you want to rank. After you fix the big issues, paste a fuller version to catch stray mismatches.
Use Copy Report to speed up reviews with others. Paste the report into your doc or ticket so writers and editors see the same check details you saw. It keeps feedback concrete.
Try one close keyword variation as a second pass. Keep the page text the same, change only the target keyword, and grade again. If the report changes a lot, your page topic may be too broad.
Keyword Density Checker
What is Keyword Density Checker
Keyword Density Checker helps you see which words and phrases stand out in your draft so you can tune your copy without guesswork. Too much repetition feels spammy; too little emphasis blurs your topic. The free Keyword Density Checker by FlexiTools.io analyzes single words, 2-word and 3-word phrases, and any target keywords you care about. In the next 60 seconds, you can paste content, adjust options, click Analyze Density, and review counts, percentages, and simple SEO recommendations.
How to Use Our Keyword Density Checker
Paste content and set targets
Add your text in Content to Analyze. Optionally list Target Keywords separated by commas to track specific terms.
Choose analysis options
Set Min Word Length, pick how many to show in Show Top Keywords, keep Exclude common stop words on, and include 2-word & 3-word phrases. Then click Analyze Density.
Review the results
See Total Words, Unique Words, Avg Word Length, and Lexical Diversity. Use the tabs to switch between Single Words, 2-Word Phrases, and 3-Word Phrases. Each table shows Rank, Keyword or Phrase, Count, Density, and a Distribution bar.
Act and share
Check Target Keyword Analysis and SEO Recommendations for quick fixes. Click Export Report (CSV) to save a spreadsheet or Copy Results to paste into your notes. Use Clear All or Load Sample as needed.
Why FlexiTools.io Offers the Best Keyword Density Checker
Word and phrase analysis in one view
Single terms alone can mislead. This tool also measures 2-word and 3-word phrases so you see real topics, not just stems.
Flexible filters that match your intent
Min Word Length and stop word removal keep noise down, while Top N and phrase toggles help you focus on what matters right now.
Target tracking plus quick exports
Track key terms in a dedicated panel and export the full report as CSV. Copy a clean summary with one click.
FlexiTools.io vs typical alternatives
FlexiTools.io: Single, 2-word, and 3-word tabs - Alternatives: Words only
FlexiTools.io: Min length, stop words, and Top N controls - Alternatives: Fixed settings
FlexiTools.io: Target Keyword Analysis and SEO tips - Alternatives: Raw counts with no guidance
FlexiTools.io: CSV export and Copy Results - Alternatives: Gated or missing exports
A Deeper Look at Keyword Density and On-page Signals
What density measures - and what it misses
Keyword density is the share of words taken by a term or phrase. It points to prominence, which can be useful, but it is not a promise of better rankings. Two texts can have the same density and read very differently. One may be helpful and clear; the other may repeat a term in awkward ways. Treat density as a quick health check, not a goal to chase.
Search guidance has been clear for years: avoid stuffing terms unnaturally. Overuse leads to a poor reading experience and can be flagged as spammy. If you need a reference, see Google’s guidance about avoiding keyword stuffing on Google Search Central, which warns against repetitive or unnatural use of words simply to manipulate visibility. Helpful content wins because it answers a need, not because it hits a magic percentage.
Phrases vs single words
Single-word tallies often bubble up function words or stems that don’t explain intent. Phrases do a better job. For example, “credit card” expresses a topic; “credit” alone is too broad. Likewise, “best running shoes” is more useful than separate counts of “best,” “running,” and “shoes.” That’s why this tool reports both 2-word and 3-word phrases. It gives you a cleaner signal about topics and avoids chasing isolated tokens.
When scanning the phrase tabs, ask: does the top list reflect the actual promise of the page? If you’re writing a guide to cold brew coffee, you should see phrases like “cold brew,” “brew time,” or “coffee concentrate,” not a random mix of filler. If the top phrases don’t match, adjust headings and body copy so your main ideas appear naturally.
Stop words, min length, and lexical diversity
Stop words like “the,” “and,” or “of” rarely help with topic focus. Excluding them keeps results clean. Min Word Length also trims noise from very short fragments that slip past simple filters. These settings reduce clutter so you can focus on meaningful terms.
Lexical diversity - the ratio of unique words to total words - offers a quick feel for variety. A very low value can hint at repetition. A very high value might mean lots of rare words that can slow reading. There’s no single right number. Use it as a nudge: if diversity is low and density for one term is high, prune repeats or swap in natural synonyms where meaning stays the same.
Reasonable ranges and spam risk
There is no universal “ideal” density. Advice like “2-3 percent for every term” ignores context. A branded product page that must repeat a model name will look different from a how-to article. Rather than aiming for a fixed number, look for balance:
Your main topic should appear in titles, headings, and the opening lines in natural language.
Key phrases should show up enough to signal relevance, not so often that sentences feel forced.
Secondary phrases should support the main idea without crowding it.
If you spot high density for a non-topic term - for example, a boilerplate phrase repeated in every paragraph - reduce it. If you see a top phrase that is off-topic, consider rewriting the sentence or moving that detail to a more fitting section.
Beyond density: structure and clarity help
Even perfect density cannot save confusing structure. Clear headings, short paragraphs, and plain language help readers and search engines understand a page. For fundamentals on how search evaluates content quality, read Google’s guidance on creating helpful, reliable content on Google Search Central. On the markup side, semantic HTML from the W3C - for example, proper use of headings and lists - gives your page a logical outline that tools can parse. Density is one lens; structure and clarity finish the job.
A simple workflow you can repeat
Paste your draft and run the analysis.
Check Target Keyword Analysis to confirm your main terms appear at reasonable levels.
Review the phrase tabs. Do the top phrases match your topic? If not, tighten headings and first paragraphs.
Scan SEO Recommendations and trim repetition or add a missing phrase once where it fits.
Export the CSV for a quick record or to compare versions. Re-run after edits.
Pro-Tips for Getting the Most Out of Keyword Analysis
Write first, measure second - draft a helpful page, then use density to find repeats and gaps.
Prefer phrases in headings - a clear 2- or 3-word phrase in a heading signals topic without stuffing.
Fix one thing per pass - remove a repeated filler phrase, re-run, then adjust secondary phrases if needed.
Url Encoder and Decoder
Encode and decode URLs without guesswork
The Url Encoder and Decoder page gives you two clear tabs for encoding and decoding text or URLs. The Encode tab focuses on turning plain text or links into safe, percent-encoded strings, while the Decode tab reverses that process. Each side has its own input box, options row, convert button, and output box, so you always know which direction you are working in. Live character counts, paste and copy buttons, and a compact reference table all sit nearby to keep you oriented.
At the bottom of the screen, you see shared controls: Clear All, Swap Input/Output, and Load Sample. A short “Encoding Methods Explained” section explains what each encoding type is best for. A slim status bar under everything is ready to show short messages about actions, such as copying or loading a sample.
Using Url Encoder and Decoder step by step
Pick the Encode or Decode tab at the top, depending on what you need. The active tab is highlighted, and its panel is visible.
In the active panel, paste or type your text into the main textarea. Watch the character counter under the field as you work, and use the Paste button if you want to grab clipboard content in one click.
Choose an Encoding Type or Decoding Type from the dropdown. Leave Auto-encode or Auto-decode checked for live updates, or turn it off and use the Encode or Decode button when you are ready.
Read the result in the output box, then use the copy button next to it to move the encoded or decoded string into your browser, code editor, or documentation.
If you want to reverse direction, use Swap Input/Output to move the current result into the other tab, then run the opposite operation.
How the tool reduces manual encoding errors
Hand-writing percent-encoded strings is slow and easy to get wrong, especially with query parameters and special characters. Here, the input, encoding options, and output sit in a single column, so you can see the original and encoded forms side by side. The “Encoding Type” menu names match common methods, such as encodeURIComponent and encodeURI, which makes it easier to choose the right approach for a query piece or a full URL.
Character counters and the size difference line under the encoded output show how encoding changes length. That feedback matters if you work with URL length limits or log storage. The “Common URL Encoded Characters” reference grid near the bottom lets you confirm how spaces, hashes, and other symbols map to codes like %20 or %23 without leaving the page.
Understanding URL encoding, decoding, and the results
URL encoding exists so that links can safely carry characters that might otherwise break or confuse parsers. Spaces, non-ASCII symbols, and reserved characters like “?” and “&” all need a safe representation inside a URL. The Encode tab shows this clearly: you paste “https://example.com?name=John Doe&city=New York,” choose an encoding type, and watch characters such as spaces change to %20 or plus signs.
The Encoding Type dropdown shapes how strict that process is. “encodeURIComponent (Recommended)” focuses on parts of a URL, such as query parameters or path segments. It encodes most characters that might have special meaning, which keeps data values separate from URL structure. “encodeURI (Full URL)” keeps key separators like “:”, “/”, “?”, and “#” as they are, which fits whole URLs that already have the right layout and only need unsafe characters encoded.
“escape (Legacy)” and “unescape (Legacy)” exist for older patterns and should usually be used only when you know a system still expects them. They can treat some characters differently from modern methods. Base64 in each menu is a different style of encoding that represents data using a restricted set of characters, often used for binary data or basic obfuscation. The “Encode All Characters” option turns every character into percent-encoded form, which can help in strict contexts where any raw symbol might cause trouble.
The difference between encoding a component and a full URL is explained well in the MDN guide to percent-encoding. Reading that resource alongside the Encoding Methods section on this page helps you match each dropdown label to real browser behavior. The overall structure of URLs follows the W3C URL standard, which is the same set of rules many browsers use when they handle links you type or click.
On the Decode tab, the logic reverses. You paste text such as “Hello%20World%21” or “https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com,” pick a Decoding Type, and the tool turns the codes back into readable characters. “decodeURIComponent (Standard)” and “decodeURI (Full URL)” line up with the methods used on the encoding side. Keeping these pairs straight ensures you do not accidentally decode too much, such as turning “%23” back into “#” in a place where it should stay encoded.
The “Auto-detect” option in the Decoding Type menu focuses on convenience. It suggests that the tool can make a best guess about the right decoding method based on the structure of the input. If that guess does not give the result you expect, you can switch to a specific method and run Decode again, checking the output in the lower textarea.
The Base64 choices on both tabs matter when you work with data URLs, tokens, or simple obfuscation schemes. Base64 encoding does not use percent signs. Instead, it maps data into letters, digits, “+”, “/”, and “=”. The Info cards at the bottom summarize that role and suggest Base64 for binary data or cases where you want to keep content readable by machines but less obvious to humans at a glance.
The “Encode All Characters” Info card explains that this mode encodes every character to its percent form. In the output, you see long strings like “%48%65%6C%6C%6F” for “Hello.” That may feel heavy for normal URLs, but it can help in strict systems or educational cases where you want to see exact hex values for each byte.
The reference grid of “Common URL Encoded Characters” grounds these ideas in concrete mappings. It shows that a space becomes “%20 or +” and that “&” becomes “%26.” Having this list a small scroll away helps when you compare raw and encoded strings. You can copy an encoded output, glance at the grid, and confirm that all the expected characters changed form.
On both tabs, the output areas are read-only, which protects results from small typing mistakes as you review them. To change the content, you go back to the input box, adjust text or options, and run Encode or Decode again. The Swap Input/Output button at the bottom links both directions of work. After encoding, you can swap, move to the Decode tab, and confirm that decoding restores the original text exactly. This round trip test is a good way to build confidence that you picked the right method for your case.
What the tool does not do
The page does not send requests or test whether encoded URLs respond correctly in a browser. It only changes how text is represented, not how servers behave. If an encoded link returns an error, the cause may be outside the encoding itself.
It also does not validate that an entire URL is well-formed beyond the characters you encode or decode. Structure issues like missing schemes, broken domains, or empty query keys are still up to you and any external validators you use. Url Encoder and Decoder focuses on character-level changes, not full link health.
Practical tips for everyday use
Use the “encodeURIComponent (Recommended)” mode for query parameters, form values, and any piece that gets added to a URL, and reserve “encodeURI” for full URLs that already have their structure in place. Keep Auto-encode and Auto-decode turned on while you experiment, then switch them off when you want to lock in one clear action per click.
When debugging, run a sample value through both tabs: encode a short phrase, swap, and decode it again. The results should match the starting text exactly, which shows that your chosen method is consistent. For teaching or documentation, point to the “Encoding Methods Explained” cards and the “Common URL Encoded Characters” grid, and keep Url Encoder and Decoder open as a live companion while you explain how URLs handle special characters.
Meta Tag Generator
Set up page meta tags with live previews
Meta Tag Generatorputs your key SEO and social meta fields on one screen, with previews that update to match what you type. At the top, three tabs split your inputs into Basic, Social Media, and Advanced, so you can focus on one layer at a time. On the right, a preview area shows how your page could look on Google, Facebook, and Twitter, depending on which preview tab you choose. At the bottom, an output box holds the generated meta tag code, with Copy and Download buttons beside it.
The Basic tab covers title, description, keywords, author, language, and canonical URL. The Social Media tab adds Open Graph and Twitter Card fields, grouped with small icons so you see which platform they relate to. The Advanced tab lets you toggle robots directives, set viewport and charset, choose a theme color, and add optional fields like revisit-after, rating, copyright, and geo region. A status line under everything is ready to show short messages about actions like generating or clearing.
Using Meta Tag Generator step by step
Start on the Basic tab. Enter a Page Title and Meta Description, watching the live character counters below each field. Add optional keywords, author, language, and a canonical URL if you have them.
Switch to the Social Media tab. Fill in or adjust OG Title, Description, Image, Type, URL, and Site Name, or leave some fields blank to fall back to your basic values. Then set Twitter Card options such as card type, title, description, image, and @username.
Open the Advanced tab to fine-tune robots directives, viewport, charset, theme color, revisit, rating, copyright, and geo region. Use the color picker and HEX field together for theme color if you want to match your brand.
Click Generate Tags at the bottom. The Generated Meta Tags box fills with HTML. Check the Google, Facebook, and Twitter preview tabs, then use the Copy or Download buttons to move the code into your page template or CMS.
If you want to start fresh at any point, the Clear All button wipes all fields and output at once.
How this generator removes guesswork from meta tags
Without this page, you might type meta tags by hand, switch to separate guides to recall attributes, and only see how they look after publishing. Here, the three input tabs and the preview pane sit side by side. That means you can see how a small change to a title or description affects the Google snapshot, or how a new image URL changes the Facebook and Twitter cards, before you ship anything.
The character counters beside title and description remove much of the trial and error. You see your current length as “0/70” or “0/160” and also get a recommended range. You do not have to guess if a title might be too long for typical search snippets. The Copy and Download buttons under the Generated Meta Tags box also save time, letting you move complete, consistent code into your project without retyping.
Understanding your meta tags, previews, and settings
Basic tags and search snippets
The Basic tab is where you set the tags that search engines rely on most often. The Page Title field maps to the <title> element in HTML. The live counter and hint text remind you that around 50–60 characters tends to fit common search layouts. The Meta Description textarea shows a similar counter, this time pointing you toward 150–160 characters, which aligns with typical snippet length ranges.
These ranges echo advice you can read in Google Search Central’s guidance on titles and snippets. Clear, honest titles and descriptions help users decide if your result matches their intent. In the tool, you can tweak wording and watch the Google preview update below, which gives you a sense of how your entry might look in a results page.
Keywords, author, language, and canonical URL sit just below the core fields. The Keywords line is marked as optional and carries a note that many search engines rarely use it. The Author field helps with ownership and bylines. The Language dropdown sets a language value for your page. The Canonical URL field is there to declare the preferred address when similar content exists at multiple URLs. Including it in the same form encourages you to think about duplication while you plan your tags.
Social meta: Open Graph and Twitter Card
The Social Media tab is split into two clear blocks. The first covers Open Graph tags for platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn. You can set OG Title, Description, Image, Type, URL, and Site Name. If you leave the OG Title or Description empty, the placeholder hints remind you that the tool can fall back to the basic title and meta description. This keeps your setup simple for pages that do not need separate social text.
Open Graph image hints mention a recommended size of 1200×630 pixels, which is a common format for large link cards. Matching that hint helps your image fill the social card without odd crops. OG Type lets you choose whether the page behaves like a website, article, product, or other content style, which can affect how some platforms present it.
The Twitter Card block manages tags like card type, title, description, image, and site handle. Card Type options include Summary and Summary Large Image, so you can choose between smaller and larger visual cards. If you leave Twitter Title or Description blank, they can reuse the OG or basic values, as the placeholders suggest. This avoids extra work when you want consistent messaging.
The way these tags are expressed in HTML matches patterns documented in resources like MDN’s meta element reference. Reading that reference alongside your generated output can help you connect each field label on screen to the exact attributes and values you paste into your page.
Advanced controls: robots, viewport, charset, and more
The Advanced tab gathers settings that affect how crawlers, browsers, and some services handle your page. Robots Directives appear as a series of checkboxes: Index, Follow, Archive, Snippet, and Image Index. When checked, they suggest that search engines may index the page, follow links, keep cached copies, show snippets, and index images. Turning some off lets you express more restrictive rules, such as noarchive or nosnippet behavior.
The Viewport dropdown covers layouts for responsive design, fixed width, and a “None” option. The default “width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0” reflects the pattern many modern sites use for mobile-friendly pages. Charset choices include UTF‑8 and some legacy encodings. Most sites benefit from UTF‑8, which the tool marks as recommended, because it supports a wide range of characters.
Theme Color controls how some browsers tint interface elements like the mobile address bar. Here you get both a color picker and a HEX input, kept in sync. Revisit After and Content Rating are optional hints that some systems may read. Copyright and Geo Region are free-text fields where you can note ownership and regional focus with values like “© 2024 Your Company” or “US-CA”.
Live previews for Google, Facebook, and Twitter
The preview tabs on the right side show how your fields might appear on three major surfaces. The Google preview reflects your domain, title, and description in a style similar to a common search result layout. As you type, the title and description there change to match your inputs, so you can see if key phrases appear early in the text.
The Facebook preview uses the OG image block, domain, title, and description. A placeholder “1200 × 630” box stands in for your image until you set a URL. The Twitter preview shows a card with an image area, title, description, and domain. Both social previews help you judge if text feels too long, too short, or off-balance next to the image.
While these previews are not guarantees of exact live layouts, they give you a realistic frame to edit against. This reduces surprises when you share a link and see the card for the first time. You can make several small text and image tweaks in the form, regenerate, and check the previews before you commit your tags to a template.
Generated meta tag output
The Generated Meta Tags box at the bottom is your final product. After you click Generate Tags, it fills with HTML lines for <title>, <meta>, <link rel="canonical">, Open Graph tags, Twitter tags, robots meta, and other settings that match your choices across the tabs. The code appears in a formatted block so you can scan it easily.
A Copy button pulls the entire block into your clipboard for quick pasting into a page head or layout partial. The Download button saves the output as a file, which is useful if you want to keep a record, attach it to a ticket, or hand it to someone who will update templates. Because the code is always created from what you see on screen, you can trust that your tags reflect the latest text and options you set.
What this tool does not do
The tool does not fetch or edit live pages for you. It generates code based only on what you type into the form. To change a real site, you still need to paste the output into your HTML files, CMS fields, or frameworks.
It also does not measure rankings, traffic, or click-through rates. The previews help you judge how content looks, but they do not predict performance. For that, you still need analytics, search console data, and user research. Meta Tag Generator supports your setup work; tracking and strategy stay separate.
Practical tips for better meta tags
Treat the Basic tab as your foundation. Write a clear title and description first, then move to Social Media and Advanced once you are happy with those lines. Use the Google preview as a quick check for clarity, not just for length.
When you use social cards, pick an image that still looks good at small sizes and matches the hint dimensions. Keep OG and Twitter text close to your main message so users see a consistent story across channels. Each time you ship a new template or content type, keep a saved copy of the Generated Meta Tags code and revisit Meta Tag Generator whenever you refine your structure.
Backlink snapshot / quick domain link checker
Getting a fast picture of who links to a domain
You open this page when you want a quick sense of a site’s backlinks without building a full report. Backlink snapshot / quick domain link checker starts with a single input box labeled “Domain or URL.” Right beside it sits a “Check backlinks” button. Below, an empty summary area waits to fill with totals, link types, and a short table of recent links once you run a check.
After you type a domain and press the button, the upper results strip shows four cards. They read “Total backlinks,” “Referring domains,” “Do-follow links,” and “No-follow links.” Each card has a bold number and a small label. This top line tells you at a glance how prominent the domain looks in link terms.
Further down, a bar chart titled “New vs lost links (last 30 days)” displays two colored bars for each recent date, marked “New” and “Lost.” Below that sits a table labeled “Sample backlinks,” with columns for “Source URL,” “Anchor text,” “Type,” “First seen,” and “Last seen.” This table gives concrete examples to go with the headline counts.
Running a check with Backlink snapshot / quick domain link checker
Enter the domain and start the checkType a full domain like “example.com” into the “Domain or URL” field. You can also paste a specific page URL. Once it looks right, click the “Check backlinks” button. The summary strip and charts stay blank until this click.
Review the top countsAfter a short load, the four summary cards appear. “Total backlinks” and “Referring domains” give you a sense of scale, while “Do-follow links” and “No-follow links” split the total by type. The cards shift color based on size, drawing your eye to unusually high or low figures.
Scan the new vs lost chartLook at the “New vs lost links (last 30 days)” chart in the middle. Each vertical pair of bars represents one recent day. Taller “New” bars show good days for link growth, while taller “Lost” bars point to drops. Hovering a bar reveals exact counts for that date.
Inspect sample backlinks in the tableAt the bottom, the “Sample backlinks” table fills with rows. Each row lists a “Source URL,” the visible “Anchor text,” the “Type” (Do-follow or No-follow), and the “First seen” and “Last seen” dates. Clicking on a source URL opens that linking page in a new tab, so you can inspect the context.
Why this snapshot view avoids common link-check headaches
Less waiting for full exports when you just need a pulse
Full backlink exports can be heavy and slow. This page focuses on a concise set of numbers and a small, visible table. The summary cards plus the sample rows often give enough signal to decide if a domain is growing, shrinking, or staying flat in link terms.
Immediate context for search performance questions
If you notice a change in search clicks, backlinks are often part of the story. With this checker, you can run a domain and then look at the “New vs lost links (last 30 days)” chart. Seeing a cluster of lost links during a drop can send you back to resources like Google Search Central with more specific questions.
Fewer surprises from unknown or risky links
The “Sample backlinks” table surfaces linking pages and anchor texts without any extra setup. You can scan the “Source URL” column for unexpected domains or spam-like patterns. Spotting those early helps you decide whether to ignore, disavow, or try to replace them.
Understanding the link counts and sample rows
Once results appear, the first two cards, “Total backlinks” and “Referring domains,” set the scale. “Total backlinks” counts every link that points to the domain or URL you entered, including multiple links from the same site. “Referring domains” counts the number of distinct domains carrying at least one link. If “Total backlinks” is very high but “Referring domains” is low, you know many links come from a small set of sites.
The next two cards, “Do-follow links” and “No-follow links,” split that total. “Do-follow links” are links without a nofollow hint, so search engines may treat them as signals. “No-follow links” have a nofollow hint, so they may not carry the same weight. When you look at these two cards together, you can see, for example, whether most of a site’s links are likely to help with ranking or are more neutral citations.
Moving down, the “New vs lost links (last 30 days)” chart tracks how dynamic the profile appears. Each date on the horizontal axis shows two bars. The “New” bar counts backlinks that first appeared on that date, while the “Lost” bar counts backlinks that were present before but not on that date. If over several days the lost bars keep towering over new ones, it suggests the domain is shedding links faster than it gains them, at least in this snapshot.
A common misunderstanding is to treat the “New vs lost” chart as a complete history. It only covers the last 30 days, as the title states. Older lost links will not show here, even if they had a large impact on the profile. This is why the chart is best used as a short-term pulse, while the “Total backlinks” and “Referring domains” cards give longer context.
In the “Sample backlinks” table, each “Source URL” is a page that currently links to your domain or did so recently. The “Anchor text” column shows the clickable text or image alt associated with that link. If you see many rows with the same anchor, such as your brand name, it suggests a natural brand link pattern. If you see many rows with exact-match keyword anchors, it might point to more aggressive or older link tactics.
The “Type” column confirms whether a given row is Do-follow or No-follow, matching the split in the summary cards. “First seen” gives the date when this tool first detected that backlink. “Last seen” tells you the most recent date it still saw the link. When “Last seen” is much older than today’s date, it can mean that link has since vanished, even if it still counts in the “Total backlinks” number for a short time.
Clicking a “Source URL” opens that page, which is where your own judgment comes in. By looking at the linking page design, content, and how your link is placed, you can decide whether the backlink looks helpful, neutral, or harmful. Combine that with the anchor text and dates in the table to form a view of link quality, not just quantity.
One lived example: I ran my small blog’s domain through the checker on a Monday morning. The “Total backlinks” card showed 120, with 40 “Referring domains,” and the “New vs lost” chart had a tall “New” bar for the previous Friday. In the “Sample backlinks” table, I saw a new “Source URL” from a respected industry newsletter, with “Anchor text” equal to my article’s title and a Do-follow “Type.” That single row told me more about that spike than the top counts alone.
It is worth noting that this tool is not a full link audit system. You will not see spam scores, link toxicity flags, or advanced filters on screen. Instead, you see a clear snapshot of the core link metrics and a slice of concrete examples. From there, you can decide if you need deeper work in a separate audit or if the snapshot answers your immediate question.
What this backlink checker does not handle
The page does not export full backlink lists or CSV files. It will not show every link pointing to a domain, only the totals and a highlighted sample. There are no filters by country, language, or device in the visible UI. It also does not recommend disavow actions or send outreach emails; those steps remain outside this quick checker.
Practical tips for getting more from each snapshot
Run your own domain and a close competitor back to back, and jot down their “Referring domains” and Do-follow counts, so you track relative progress over time instead of single numbers. During content reviews, scroll through the “Sample backlinks” table and save the best “Source URL” examples as models for future outreach. If you see a big spike in “Lost” bars, take a screenshot of the chart, so you have a visual marker when reading later search reports alongside Backlink snapshot / quick domain link checker.
